Back in January, Steve Patterson joined us to lead a debate on logical proofs for the existence of God. The call was so good we invited him back for a second session. Here’s the rundown:
Call Title: An Argument for the Existence of God, Pt. 2
About the Guest: Steve Patterson is a philosopher and author working independent of academia. He’s the author of Square One: the Foundations of Knowledge, a book outlining the basis of his philosophy. Because he isn’t limited to any specific field, Steve’s research spans a vast array of philosophical disciplines, including logic and epistemology, metaphysics, political theory and economics, mathematics, the philosophy of mind, religion, and social commentary and criticism.
Steve says: “In my own research, I have discovered a remarkably consistent truth: orthodox opinions are almost always wrong. The “mainstream consensus” on any given topic – whether about political theory or quantum physics – frequently makes foundational errors. Thus, my worldview looks radical when compared to the mainstream.”
According to Steve, there are a lot of bad arguments for the existence of God, but there are also some good ones. In this call, Steve took the position that God (or some prime mover) does exist, argued against the concept of infinity, and dug into the definition of theism vs. deism.
Recommended Reading (from Steve):
To find out more about the guest: